header-logo header-logo

04 December 2009 / Simon Young
Issue: 7396 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

What lies beneath

Salaried partners are likely to cause problems when converting to LLPs, says Simon Young

After nearly a decade of experience of the process of converting traditional partnerships to limited liability partnerships (LLPs), it has become apparent that there is one significant group of people who are likely to cause more problems than any other.

This is not because they wish to be awkward, or because the firm’s management are approaching things wrongly, but because the very nature of their position causes difficulties. They are salaried partners.

The concept of holding out

The root of the problem, which all concerned are often reluctant to admit, is that the concept of salaried partners is a lie! A lie sanctioned by regulations, recognised implicitly by statute, and endorsed by widespread usage over centuries, but nonetheless a lie.

Those people involved are held out to the world as something they are not, and the very point of this being done is to create a belief in third parties which the firm and the individuals know is not true,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll