header-logo header-logo

04 December 2009 / Simon Young
Issue: 7396 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

What lies beneath

Salaried partners are likely to cause problems when converting to LLPs, says Simon Young

After nearly a decade of experience of the process of converting traditional partnerships to limited liability partnerships (LLPs), it has become apparent that there is one significant group of people who are likely to cause more problems than any other.

This is not because they wish to be awkward, or because the firm’s management are approaching things wrongly, but because the very nature of their position causes difficulties. They are salaried partners.

The concept of holding out

The root of the problem, which all concerned are often reluctant to admit, is that the concept of salaried partners is a lie! A lie sanctioned by regulations, recognised implicitly by statute, and endorsed by widespread usage over centuries, but nonetheless a lie.

Those people involved are held out to the world as something they are not, and the very point of this being done is to create a belief in third parties which the firm and the individuals know is not true,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll