header-logo header-logo

07 August 2026 / Ian McDougall
Issue: 8173 / Categories: Features , Profession , Rule of law , International , Public
printer mail-detail

What might court records tell us about the rule of law?

256692
© Getty images
Ian McDougall explores whether we can measure judicial independence by tracking state wins & losses in court
  • Explains the four-pillar framework used by the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation to scrutinise judicial independence.
  • Looks at the World Justice Project’s Rule of Law Index factor of ‘Constraints on government powers’.
  • Considers what percentages of government wins and losses in court can reveal, and how to read the statistics with appropriate caution.
  • Looks at data from the UK, USA and India.

When a government goes to court, whether defending a regulatory decision, prosecuting a criminal, or contesting a citizen’s claim, and loses, what does that mean? A single defeat is obviously unremarkable. A single point of reference usually tells us very little. But a consistent pattern of victories or defeats may be something else entirely. Used carefully, such may offer one of the few quantitative windows into a question that is often answered only in the abstract, namely how well is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll