header-logo header-logo

31 July 2008 / Anthony Burton
Issue: 7332 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

What price justice?

The future for criminal legal aid lies with the factory firms of solicitors, says Anthony Burton

Almost 14 years ago this journal published an article “The demise of criminal legal aid” based on an address I gave at the International Bar Association's 25th Biennial Conference in Melbourne Australia (see 144 NLJ 6669, p 1,491). My paper included a rail against the systematic dismantling of the criminal legal aid scheme by the then lord chancellor, Lord Mackay. I argued that the criminal legal aid system had been the victim of a revolution zealously orchestrated by the lord chancellor, driving home Thatcherite policies leading to the destruction of the whole philosophical basis for legal aid. It transpires that he had barely scratched the surface. Tony Blair's lord chancellors succeeded in trumping their predecessors with cost-driven measures leading to a further erosion of choice and access to quality representation.

The legal aid scheme was set up 60 years ago in 1948 following the Lord Rushcliffe's Report of the Committee on Legal Aid and Legal Advice for Poor Persons in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll