header-logo header-logo

31 July 2008 / Anthony Burton
Issue: 7332 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

What price justice?

The future for criminal legal aid lies with the factory firms of solicitors, says Anthony Burton

Almost 14 years ago this journal published an article “The demise of criminal legal aid” based on an address I gave at the International Bar Association's 25th Biennial Conference in Melbourne Australia (see 144 NLJ 6669, p 1,491). My paper included a rail against the systematic dismantling of the criminal legal aid scheme by the then lord chancellor, Lord Mackay. I argued that the criminal legal aid system had been the victim of a revolution zealously orchestrated by the lord chancellor, driving home Thatcherite policies leading to the destruction of the whole philosophical basis for legal aid. It transpires that he had barely scratched the surface. Tony Blair's lord chancellors succeeded in trumping their predecessors with cost-driven measures leading to a further erosion of choice and access to quality representation.

The legal aid scheme was set up 60 years ago in 1948 following the Lord Rushcliffe's Report of the Committee on Legal Aid and Legal Advice for Poor Persons in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll