header-logo header-logo

What price justice?

31 July 2008 / Anthony Burton
Issue: 7332 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

The future for criminal legal aid lies with the factory firms of solicitors, says Anthony Burton

Almost 14 years ago this journal published an article “The demise of criminal legal aid” based on an address I gave at the International Bar Association's 25th Biennial Conference in Melbourne Australia (see 144 NLJ 6669, p 1,491). My paper included a rail against the systematic dismantling of the criminal legal aid scheme by the then lord chancellor, Lord Mackay. I argued that the criminal legal aid system had been the victim of a revolution zealously orchestrated by the lord chancellor, driving home Thatcherite policies leading to the destruction of the whole philosophical basis for legal aid. It transpires that he had barely scratched the surface. Tony Blair's lord chancellors succeeded in trumping their predecessors with cost-driven measures leading to a further erosion of choice and access to quality representation.

The legal aid scheme was set up 60 years ago in 1948 following the Lord Rushcliffe's Report of the Committee on Legal Aid and Legal Advice for Poor Persons in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll