header-logo header-logo

What’s in a WhatsApp message?

252778
© Getty images

Professor Sukhninder Panesar ponders the legal enforceability of electronic communications between separating couples

  • Covers the recent family law case of Reid Roberts v Mei Lin, concerning the legal effect of intentions expressed through WhatsApp and email.

In an age of digital communication and messaging, it is common for individuals to communicate with each other using platforms such as email, WhatsApp and Messenger. Most daily communications between people are through digital messages. Whether such messages amount to a formal expression of intention or indeed hold any legal significance is another matter.

In this context, it was only going to be a matter of time before the English courts would have to decide upon the question of the enforceability and effect of a WhatsApp message on an agreement to transfer an interest in property. That opportunity to decide arose in a recent High Court decision before Mr Justice Cawson in Reid-Roberts v Mei Lin [2026] EWHC 49 (Ch).

The case involved a separation between

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll