header-logo header-logo

What’s in a WhatsApp message?

252778
© Getty images

Professor Sukhninder Panesar ponders the legal enforceability of electronic communications between separating couples

  • Covers the recent family law case of Reid Roberts v Mei Lin, concerning the legal effect of intentions expressed through WhatsApp and email.

In an age of digital communication and messaging, it is common for individuals to communicate with each other using platforms such as email, WhatsApp and Messenger. Most daily communications between people are through digital messages. Whether such messages amount to a formal expression of intention or indeed hold any legal significance is another matter.

In this context, it was only going to be a matter of time before the English courts would have to decide upon the question of the enforceability and effect of a WhatsApp message on an agreement to transfer an interest in property. That opportunity to decide arose in a recent High Court decision before Mr Justice Cawson in Reid-Roberts v Mei Lin [2026] EWHC 49 (Ch).

The case involved a separation between

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
back-to-top-scroll