header-logo header-logo

05 June 2026 / Chris Bryden , Josh Stamp-Simon
Issue: 8164 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Family
printer mail-detail

What’s mine is theirs

251508
© Getty images
Chris Bryden and Josh Stamp-Simon assess the potential inheritance rights of those in throuples, poly quads and other polyamorous relationships
  • Surveys caselaw relevant to relationships lived outwith the heterodoxy.
  • Considers potential for an Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 claim by a person or persons within a polyamorous relationship.

Could a person in a polyamorous relationship (ie a relationship involving three or more persons) be entitled to bring a claim against the estate of one of their deceased partners on the basis of ss 1(1)(ba) and 1(1A) of the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (the 1975 Act)? Subsection 1(1A) provides for eligibility to bring a claim where: ‘The deceased died on or after 1st January 1996 and, during the whole of the period of two years ending immediately before the date when the deceased died, the person was living—

(a) in the same household as the deceased, and

(b) as if that person and the deceased were a married couple or civil partners’.

While

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
Britain’s new acknowledgement that Israel’s occupation is unlawful, and accompanying settlement-goods ban and sanctions, is significant but overdue, argue Danny Friedman KC and Victor Kattan in NLJ this week
New planning fee rises, wider trade union access rights and a service-by-email trap feature in Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
back-to-top-scroll