header-logo header-logo

08 December 2017 / Rebecca Probert
Issue: 7773 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

When Harry met Meghan

nlj_7773_probert

Rebecca Probert provides a handy guide to the law governing royal marriages

As Walter Bagehot remarked in 1863, when the future Edward VII married Alexandra of Denmark, ‘a princely marriage is the brilliant edition of a universal fact, and as such it rivets mankind.’ The announcement that Prince Harry is to marry Meghan Markle is proving similarly riveting. As it has already sparked discussion about the special laws governing royal marriages, here is a brief guide to those laws—past, present, and possibly future.

The consent of the sovereign

The Royal Marriages Act 1772 required the prior consent of the sovereign to the marriages of all descendants of George II except the issue of princesses who had married into foreign families. Those over 25 could alternatively give notice to the Privy Council and marry without the sovereign’s consent unless both Houses of Parliament disapproved—but this option has never been tested.

The Act’s scope was much debated. One ingenious argument was that it did not apply to any of Edward VII’s descendants, ie the current royal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll