header-logo header-logo

When Harry met Meghan

08 December 2017 / Rebecca Probert
Issue: 7773 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
nlj_7773_probert

Rebecca Probert provides a handy guide to the law governing royal marriages

As Walter Bagehot remarked in 1863, when the future Edward VII married Alexandra of Denmark, ‘a princely marriage is the brilliant edition of a universal fact, and as such it rivets mankind.’ The announcement that Prince Harry is to marry Meghan Markle is proving similarly riveting. As it has already sparked discussion about the special laws governing royal marriages, here is a brief guide to those laws—past, present, and possibly future.

The consent of the sovereign

The Royal Marriages Act 1772 required the prior consent of the sovereign to the marriages of all descendants of George II except the issue of princesses who had married into foreign families. Those over 25 could alternatively give notice to the Privy Council and marry without the sovereign’s consent unless both Houses of Parliament disapproved—but this option has never been tested.

The Act’s scope was much debated. One ingenious argument was that it did not apply to any of Edward VII’s descendants, ie the current royal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll