header-logo header-logo

When in Rome...

11 November 2011 / Gerard Mcdermott KC
Issue: 7489 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Gerard McDermott QC revisits Rome II, considering Homawoo & the opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi

The number of accidents involving people who are injured while working or on holiday abroad is, inevitably, on the increase. Practitioners in this field are all alert to the issues as to the importance of identifying the applicable law in this regard. In the most serious of cases, such as those involving victims who suffer a spinal cord injury or a serious head injury, the determination of whether, for instance, the law of Spain or the law of England and Wales applies may mean a difference of well over £1m in terms of assessment of their future loss.

Rome II

In any case where the accident overseas occurs after 11 January 2009 then the provisions of Regulation 864/2007 (Rome II) will govern the choice of law to be used by any court within the EU determining either liability or damages in a cross border tort claim. Particularly, in terms of the question of determination of damages this

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll