header-logo header-logo

11 November 2011 / Gerard Mcdermott KC
Issue: 7489 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

When in Rome...

Gerard McDermott QC revisits Rome II, considering Homawoo & the opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi

The number of accidents involving people who are injured while working or on holiday abroad is, inevitably, on the increase. Practitioners in this field are all alert to the issues as to the importance of identifying the applicable law in this regard. In the most serious of cases, such as those involving victims who suffer a spinal cord injury or a serious head injury, the determination of whether, for instance, the law of Spain or the law of England and Wales applies may mean a difference of well over £1m in terms of assessment of their future loss.

Rome II

In any case where the accident overseas occurs after 11 January 2009 then the provisions of Regulation 864/2007 (Rome II) will govern the choice of law to be used by any court within the EU determining either liability or damages in a cross border tort claim. Particularly, in terms of the question of determination of damages this

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll