header-logo header-logo

When in Rome...

11 November 2011 / Gerard Mcdermott KC
Issue: 7489 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Gerard McDermott QC revisits Rome II, considering Homawoo & the opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi

The number of accidents involving people who are injured while working or on holiday abroad is, inevitably, on the increase. Practitioners in this field are all alert to the issues as to the importance of identifying the applicable law in this regard. In the most serious of cases, such as those involving victims who suffer a spinal cord injury or a serious head injury, the determination of whether, for instance, the law of Spain or the law of England and Wales applies may mean a difference of well over £1m in terms of assessment of their future loss.

Rome II

In any case where the accident overseas occurs after 11 January 2009 then the provisions of Regulation 864/2007 (Rome II) will govern the choice of law to be used by any court within the EU determining either liability or damages in a cross border tort claim. Particularly, in terms of the question of determination of damages this

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll