header-logo header-logo

Where men are not equal

07 December 2012 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7541 / Categories: Features , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
istock_000016028943medium_4

Michael Nash reports on a new Bill which aims to end an anomaly over the male partners of peers

Surprising as it may seem, there is a legal area where men are not equal. The wish to rectify this was the object of The Honours (Equality of Titles for Partners) Bill, introduced into the House of Commons in July by the Conservative MP Oliver Colville. It sought to remedy a curious, but ancient, lacuna in the law of this country, whereby although women share their husband’s rank and status, husbands do not share that of their wives. This ranges from the sovereign downwards, and is clearly at odds with the present laws of equality and equal treatment, and even with human rights legislation. The Bill also covers civil partners.

Under the current system women take the “same rank as their husbands or as their brothers; but the daughter of a peer marrying a commoner retains her rank as Lady or Honourable”. Merely official rank on the husband’s part does not

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll