header-logo header-logo

Where to sue?

09 May 2014 / Nicholas Bevan
Issue: 7605 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
web_bevan

What rights do claimants injured abroad have to sue insurers directly under the Motor Insurance Directives? Nicholas Bevan reports

Some good news at last for beleaguered RTA practitioners and, Nigel Farage please note, this comes from Europe. In the EU, jurisdictional issues are governed by Council Regulation (EC) no 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Brussels I). Similar provisions apply to a defendant domiciled in Norway, Iceland, Switzerland or Denmark under the Lugano Convention 2007. If the defendant is based outside the EU/EEA, it is necessary to look to the national laws of the EU state seized of the claim (almost always where the accident occurred) to determine jurisdiction; in the UK the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 applies.

The basic proposition under Brussels I is set out in Art 2(1) which states: “Subject to this regulation, persons domiciled in a member state shall, whatever their nationality, be sued in the courts of that member state.”

As with any basic rule, there are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll