header-logo header-logo

Whipping up a storm

09 February 2012
Issue: 7500 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Government & ABI “stoking” compensation culture myth

A leading personal injury lawyer has accused government ministers and the Association of British Insurers of “stoking” the myth of the compensation culture.

A “stream of prejudice” against personal injury (PI) claimants has given rise to measures such as the Jackson reforms which, he argues, will make it more difficult for injured workers to claim compensation, and the government’s reining in of whiplash claims.

Writing in NLJ, Patrick Allen, senior partner at Hodge, Jones & Allen, says: “It seems that it is not the consequences of the banking collapse which is holding back the economy but British businesses that ‘every day battle against a tide of risk-assessment forms and face the fear of being sued for massive sums’.

“In fact, precisely the opposite is true in terms of the effects on the economy, as you can find a few clicks away on the Health and Safety Executive’s website. In 2010-11, 26.4 million days were lost due to work-related illness and workplace injury. 1.2 million people were suffering from an illness which they believed was caused or made worse by their work. Workplace injuries and ill health (excluding cancer) cost society an estimated £14bn in 2009-10.”

Allen notes the Transport Select Committee wants the “bar raised” on the proof required for a whiplash claim. He asks whether the committee may be “overreacting”.

The Ministry of Justice announced last week that the implementation of the Jackson reforms, which are likely ro reduce the number of PI claims, will be delayed until April 2013. The legal aid provisions of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill have also been delayed until that date.

NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan, of City Law School, says: “The postponement is welcome. It is essential, given the enormity of the reforms, that measures are thoroughly prepared. The current Pt 36 mess is due to implementation with undue haste in 2007.”

Issue: 7500 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll