header-logo header-logo

06 June 2013
Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Will

Simon v Byford and others [2013] All ER (D) 321 (May)

It was settled law that testamentary capacity required a testatrix to be able to remember the claims which potential beneficiaries had on the estate, so as to achieve a rational and just testament. Further, testamentary capacity had to be established as at the time of the will. The test of capacity was issue-specific and was to be considered in relation to the particular transaction and its nature and complexity. It was not necessary that the testatrix should be able to understand the legal terminology which gave effect to her wishes. Once a court was satisfied that the testatrix had the capacity to understand what she had been doing, it was readily accepted that she had understood. Nevertheless, in some cases it was necessary to prove knowledge and approval. That was so where the testatrix was mentally or physically frail, or where beneficiaries had been part of the process of drawing up the will. In such cases, the judge had to consider whether the suspicion had been dispelled. NLJ

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll