header-logo header-logo

19 October 2018
Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Windrush reforms reviewed

MPs and Peers on the Joint Committee on Human Rights are to examine proposed Home Office reforms to immigration detention made in response to the Windrush detention scandal.

The Home Office proposals, published this week, include piloting a scheme to manage in the community individuals who would otherwise be detained at Yarl’s Wood Detention Centre, increase use of face-to-face meetings to identify vulnerabilities and resolve potential problems, and reassess its adult at risk policy.

The Home Office has also set up the Windrush Taskforce, which has issued more than 2,300 documents confirming status and enabled more than 2,100 individuals to become British citizens.  

Members of the Windrush generation, who migrated to the UK before 1973, including Anthony Bryan and Paulette Wilson, were wrongly detained and deported due to Home Office errors. Both Bryan and Wilson had indefinite leave to remain in the UK but did not have the correct documents to confirm their status.

Home Secretary Sajid Javid has personally apologised to those affected.

Harriet Harman MP, Chair of the Joint Committee, which will begin its inquiry at the end of this month, said: ‘The wrongful detention of Anthony Bryan and Paulette Wilson were not simply “mistakes” but systemic failures in the system, so the apologies to them from the Home Office in this response to our report were necessary. 

‘Our Committee will closely examine the government’s outlined proposed reforms to the immigration detention system during our upcoming inquiry. For example, we’ll look at the piloting of an automatic bail referral system after two months and the idea of increasing the size and scope of the system for checking detention decisions, and whether these, amongst the other proposals, go far enough to address the current problems in the system.

‘We will also examine the case for time limits on immigration detention and, if indefinite detention is to end, how this should work in practice when we examine the evidence in coming weeks.’

The Home Office has also commissioned an independent review into the scandal, which is due to report back by 31 March 2019.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll