header-logo header-logo

Windrush reforms reviewed

19 October 2018
Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

MPs and Peers on the Joint Committee on Human Rights are to examine proposed Home Office reforms to immigration detention made in response to the Windrush detention scandal.

The Home Office proposals, published this week, include piloting a scheme to manage in the community individuals who would otherwise be detained at Yarl’s Wood Detention Centre, increase use of face-to-face meetings to identify vulnerabilities and resolve potential problems, and reassess its adult at risk policy.

The Home Office has also set up the Windrush Taskforce, which has issued more than 2,300 documents confirming status and enabled more than 2,100 individuals to become British citizens.  

Members of the Windrush generation, who migrated to the UK before 1973, including Anthony Bryan and Paulette Wilson, were wrongly detained and deported due to Home Office errors. Both Bryan and Wilson had indefinite leave to remain in the UK but did not have the correct documents to confirm their status.

Home Secretary Sajid Javid has personally apologised to those affected.

Harriet Harman MP, Chair of the Joint Committee, which will begin its inquiry at the end of this month, said: ‘The wrongful detention of Anthony Bryan and Paulette Wilson were not simply “mistakes” but systemic failures in the system, so the apologies to them from the Home Office in this response to our report were necessary. 

‘Our Committee will closely examine the government’s outlined proposed reforms to the immigration detention system during our upcoming inquiry. For example, we’ll look at the piloting of an automatic bail referral system after two months and the idea of increasing the size and scope of the system for checking detention decisions, and whether these, amongst the other proposals, go far enough to address the current problems in the system.

‘We will also examine the case for time limits on immigration detention and, if indefinite detention is to end, how this should work in practice when we examine the evidence in coming weeks.’

The Home Office has also commissioned an independent review into the scandal, which is due to report back by 31 March 2019.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Partner appointed to head international insolvency and dispute resolution for England

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Kent firm expands regional footprint through strategic acquisition

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Financial disputes and investigations specialist joins as partner in London

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll