header-logo header-logo

08 May 2008 / Alexander Hickey , Elspeth Owens
Issue: 7320 / Categories: Features , Local government , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail

Withholding tactics

Contractors need to beware of employers giving early withholding notices, say Alexander Hickey and Elspeth Owens

In Reinwood v Brown [2008] UKHL 12, [2008] All ER (D) 283 (Feb) the House of Lords has revisited withholding notices under s 111 and the payment regime of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (HGCRA 1996) as incorporated in the Joint Contracts Tribunal Standard Form of Building Contract 1998 edition (JCT 1998). In Reinwood the law lords gave another ruling in favour of employers which may prove to be as controversial as last year's decision in Melville Dundas Ltd (in receivership) v George Wimpey UK Ltd and others [2007] UKHL 18, [2007] All ER (D) 226 (Apr). HGCRA 1996, s 111 provides:

  •   
    (1)     A party to a construction contract may not withhold payment after the final date for payment of a sum due under the contract unless he has given an effective notice of intention to withhold payment.
  •   
    (2)     To be effective
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll