header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
08 May 2008 / Alexander Hickey , Elspeth Owens
Issue: 7320 / Categories: Features , Local government , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail

Withholding tactics

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Contractors need to beware of employers giving early withholding notices, say Alexander Hickey and Elspeth Owens

In Reinwood v Brown [2008] UKHL 12, [2008] All ER (D) 283 (Feb) the House of Lords has revisited withholding notices under s 111 and the payment regime of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (HGCRA 1996) as incorporated in the Joint Contracts Tribunal Standard Form of Building Contract 1998 edition (JCT 1998). In Reinwood the law lords gave another ruling in favour of employers which may prove to be as controversial as last year's decision in Melville Dundas Ltd (in receivership) v George Wimpey UK Ltd and others [2007] UKHL 18, [2007] All ER (D) 226 (Apr). HGCRA 1996, s 111 provides:

  •   
    (1)     A party to a construction contract may not withhold payment after the final date for payment of a sum due under the contract unless he has given an effective notice of intention to withhold payment.
  •   
    (2)     To be effective
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll