header-logo header-logo

Words & intentions

04 October 2018 / Mark Warwick
Issue: 7811 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Can there be an express declaration of trust, without any declaration? Mark Warwick QC investigates

  • Reviews the Court of Appeal decision in Ong v Ping on whether a trust can be created without declaration.

Contrary to expectation, the Court of Appeal recently stated that it is possible to create a trust by express declaration, without there being a declaration. The case in question is Ong v Ping [2017] EWCA Civ 2069, [2017] All ER (D) 68 (Dec). The parties were various family members. On one side was a mother (Jane) and her three children. On the other side was Jane’s brother in law (Ping). In 1988 Jane began litigation, alleging that a large house in Highgate (the house) was held upon trusts in her favour. Nearly 30 years later, after extensive litigation in England and Singapore, an English judge (Morgan J) decided that the house was held upon trusts, but these did not benefit Jane, rather other family members. The Court of Appeal upheld the judge’s decision.

It is in the course of the lead judgment

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll