header-logo header-logo

18 August 2015 / Francesca Kaye , Elliot Elsey
Issue: 7666 / Categories: Features , Litigation trends
printer mail-detail

Worth the wait?

Francesca Kaye & Elliot Elsey herald the coming into force of the Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 2010

Knowledge is power and an important tool in the management of risk in litigation. 

For the claimant, the ability to recover its losses is the ultimate validation of litigation and is at its most uncertain following recession. As recession recedes, a potential claimant will often only have an insolvent party (and more importantly its insurance policy) to pursue.

Typically these claims relate to negligent advice, and the injured party needs to know if the insolvent insured’s professional indemnity policy will respond to the claim, or whether good money is being thrown after bad. 

Insurers have long limited claimants’ rights to access information about policies as an effective tool to increase the perception of risk and encourage the abandonment or settlement of claims on significantly reduced terms. 

Third parties’ rights to information about the insolvent insured’s policies will increase significantly with the imminent introduction of long overdue legislation. 

Good things come… 

The Third

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll