header-logo header-logo

07 July 2011 / Mark Sefton , Oliver Radley-Gardner
Issue: 7473 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

In the wrong

One cannot rely upon one’s own wrong in the courtroom, observe Oliver Radley-Gardner & Mark Sefton

In the well known case of Interfoto Picture Library v. Stiletto [1989] QB 433, [1988] 1 All ER 348, Bingham LJ explained that, rather than developing an overriding general concept of good faith, the English law has adopted “piecemeal solutions to demonstrated problems of unfairness” without recourse to any more general concept. This article considers one of those solutions, namely the principle that a contracting party should not be permitted to rely upon his own wrong to take a benefit under his contract. This principle has been considered in a series of recent cases, frequently involving development agreements, contracts for the disposition of interests in land, and leases.

The New Zealand Shipping case

In New Zealand Shipping Co Ltd v Société des Ateliers et Chantiers de France [1919] AC 1, [1918-19] All ER Rep 552 the House of Lords was concerned with a contract by a French company, the vendors, to build a steamboat

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll