header-logo header-logo

07 July 2011 / Mark Sefton , Oliver Radley-Gardner
Issue: 7473 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

In the wrong

One cannot rely upon one’s own wrong in the courtroom, observe Oliver Radley-Gardner & Mark Sefton

In the well known case of Interfoto Picture Library v. Stiletto [1989] QB 433, [1988] 1 All ER 348, Bingham LJ explained that, rather than developing an overriding general concept of good faith, the English law has adopted “piecemeal solutions to demonstrated problems of unfairness” without recourse to any more general concept. This article considers one of those solutions, namely the principle that a contracting party should not be permitted to rely upon his own wrong to take a benefit under his contract. This principle has been considered in a series of recent cases, frequently involving development agreements, contracts for the disposition of interests in land, and leases.

The New Zealand Shipping case

In New Zealand Shipping Co Ltd v Société des Ateliers et Chantiers de France [1919] AC 1, [1918-19] All ER Rep 552 the House of Lords was concerned with a contract by a French company, the vendors, to build a steamboat

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll