header-logo header-logo

20 July 2012 / Andrew Birtles , Rob Hines
Issue: 7523 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Before you leap...

istock_000012887565small_4

Rob Hines & Andrew Birtles examine cohabitation law in Scotland & its future in England & Wales

In Gow (FC) v Grant (Scotland) [2012] UKSC 29 the Supreme Court handed down a landmark judgment on cohabitation law in Scotland. Perhaps just as significant were the comments made by Lady Hale in her concluding remarks, in which she issued a clear rallying call for the creation of similar laws in England and Wales.

Mr Grant, aged 58, and Ms Gow, aged 64, began a relationship in 2001. In December 2002, Grant asked Gow to move into his property and Gow agreed to do so, on the condition that they became engaged.

When the parties met they each owned their own home and were in employment. Six months into the cohabitation Gow, with Grant’s encouragement, sold her Edinburgh home for £50,000, the proceeds being used to discharge her debts and to fund the parties’ living expenses. By 2009, the value of Gow’s former flat had increased £38,000 above the sale value. In 2003,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll