header-logo header-logo

Before you leap...

20 July 2012 / Andrew Birtles , Rob Hines
Issue: 7523 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
istock_000012887565small_4

Rob Hines & Andrew Birtles examine cohabitation law in Scotland & its future in England & Wales

In Gow (FC) v Grant (Scotland) [2012] UKSC 29 the Supreme Court handed down a landmark judgment on cohabitation law in Scotland. Perhaps just as significant were the comments made by Lady Hale in her concluding remarks, in which she issued a clear rallying call for the creation of similar laws in England and Wales.

Mr Grant, aged 58, and Ms Gow, aged 64, began a relationship in 2001. In December 2002, Grant asked Gow to move into his property and Gow agreed to do so, on the condition that they became engaged.

When the parties met they each owned their own home and were in employment. Six months into the cohabitation Gow, with Grant’s encouragement, sold her Edinburgh home for £50,000, the proceeds being used to discharge her debts and to fund the parties’ living expenses. By 2009, the value of Gow’s former flat had increased £38,000 above the sale value. In 2003,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll