header-logo header-logo

Before you leap...

20 July 2012 / Andrew Birtles , Rob Hines
Issue: 7523 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
istock_000012887565small_4

Rob Hines & Andrew Birtles examine cohabitation law in Scotland & its future in England & Wales

In Gow (FC) v Grant (Scotland) [2012] UKSC 29 the Supreme Court handed down a landmark judgment on cohabitation law in Scotland. Perhaps just as significant were the comments made by Lady Hale in her concluding remarks, in which she issued a clear rallying call for the creation of similar laws in England and Wales.

Mr Grant, aged 58, and Ms Gow, aged 64, began a relationship in 2001. In December 2002, Grant asked Gow to move into his property and Gow agreed to do so, on the condition that they became engaged.

When the parties met they each owned their own home and were in employment. Six months into the cohabitation Gow, with Grant’s encouragement, sold her Edinburgh home for £50,000, the proceeds being used to discharge her debts and to fund the parties’ living expenses. By 2009, the value of Gow’s former flat had increased £38,000 above the sale value. In 2003,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
back-to-top-scroll