header-logo header-logo

At your service?

22 April 2010 / Victoria Sugden , Paul Castellani
Issue: 7414 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

When can solicitors terminate a contentious retainer & can they claim costs? ask Paul Castellani & Victoria Sugden

The legal framework governing the termination of the solicitor/client relationship in contentious matters (the “entire contract” concept) derives from 19th Century authority. Two recent decisions provide important clarification for a solicitor who wishes to terminate their retainer, particularly as to (i) what constitutes “reasonable grounds” for doing so and (ii) whether, having terminated, the solicitor is entitled to payment of his costs and disbursements up to the date of termination.

Webb v John Macdonald QC

The first case, Webb v John McDonald QC and Another, concerned whether practitioners were obliged to put forward all points asserted by their client, irrespective of merit and whether, in the light of their client’s insistence to put forward such points, it was appropriate to threaten to cease to act. The claimant, Mr Webb, was legally aided in the underlying claim and so special considerations applied to the retainer—but notwithstanding that, points of general principle emerged.

The facts

Mr

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll