header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
06 December 2013 / Justin Michaelson
Issue: 7587 / Categories: Features , ADR
printer mail-detail

A–Z of ADR: the sequel

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
web_michaelson

Justin Michaelson updates the need-to-know guide to ADR…a decade on
A
ADR

In legal parlance, the concept of “ADR” has changed over the past 10 years. Post-Woolf, “ADR” or alternative dispute resolution was shorthand for everything but litigation. Even arbitration was seen as one “alternative”. It was the buzzword for how best to clear up the court lists and encourage litigants to look elsewhere to resolve disputes. There was no specific distinction between non-binding and binding adjudicative and non-adjudicative processes. Times have changed. “ADR” as a concept encompasses non-binding and non-adjudicative methods of dispute resolution, the most common being mediation. It most definitely does not now include arbitration. “ADR” is now an aspiration, a drive away from dispute, providing the antidote to the world of litigation lawyers. The Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution (CEDR) and the International Institute for Conflict Preventation and Resolution (CPR) launched recently a “Corporate ADR Pledge” comprising a commitment to apply resources to managing and resolving disputes through negotiation, mediation and other ADR processes, with a view to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll