header-logo header-logo

14 August 2015
Issue: 7665 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Zander: Hands off the Human Rights Act

Michael Zander QC, Emeritus Professor at the LSE, writing in this week’s NLJ, questions the government’s plan to replace the Human Rights Act with a British Bill of Rights. The proposal is to put the European Convention into primary legislation but limit the use of the new law to cases that involve criminal law and the liberty of an individual, the right to property and other serious matters. Zander lists the basic rights that would be excluded, and notes a range of other problems with the plans, for example, the feasibility of restricting access when any Bill of Rights must be available to everyone within the jurisdiction, or deciding which matters are too trivial for the Bill to apply.

Issue: 7665 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll