header-logo header-logo

Zero tolerance

10 January 2008 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7303 / Categories: Features , Public , Profession , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Should the government criminalise the buying of sex? Richard Scorer reports

Harriet Harman QC, leader of the House of Commons, says the government is considering changing the law on prostitution to make the buying of sexual services a criminal offence. The government’s aim is to counter the growth in trafficking of women and children into the for sexual exploitation.

 

Harman’s proposal is modelled on legislation in in 1999 which criminalised the buying of sex and decriminalised the selling of it. The principle underlying this legislation is explained by the Swedish government: “In prostitution is regarded as an aspect of violence against women and children…gender inequality will remain unattainable so long as men buy, sell and exploit women and children by prostituting them.” The Swedish law provides for prison sentences of up to six months for the buyers of sexual services, six years for pimps and 10 years for traffickers of prostitutes.

“Banning prostitution would simply drive it underground, putting prostitutes at greater risk of assault and exploitation”

 

CURRENT LAWS

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll