header-logo header-logo

10 January 2008 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7303 / Categories: Features , Public , Profession , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Zero tolerance

Should the government criminalise the buying of sex? Richard Scorer reports

Harriet Harman QC, leader of the House of Commons, says the government is considering changing the law on prostitution to make the buying of sexual services a criminal offence. The government’s aim is to counter the growth in trafficking of women and children into the for sexual exploitation.

 

Harman’s proposal is modelled on legislation in in 1999 which criminalised the buying of sex and decriminalised the selling of it. The principle underlying this legislation is explained by the Swedish government: “In prostitution is regarded as an aspect of violence against women and children…gender inequality will remain unattainable so long as men buy, sell and exploit women and children by prostituting them.” The Swedish law provides for prison sentences of up to six months for the buyers of sexual services, six years for pimps and 10 years for traffickers of prostitutes.

“Banning prostitution would simply drive it underground, putting prostitutes at greater risk of assault and exploitation”

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll