header-logo header-logo

10 January 2008 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7303 / Categories: Features , Public , Profession , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Zero tolerance

Should the government criminalise the buying of sex? Richard Scorer reports

Harriet Harman QC, leader of the House of Commons, says the government is considering changing the law on prostitution to make the buying of sexual services a criminal offence. The government’s aim is to counter the growth in trafficking of women and children into the for sexual exploitation.

 

Harman’s proposal is modelled on legislation in in 1999 which criminalised the buying of sex and decriminalised the selling of it. The principle underlying this legislation is explained by the Swedish government: “In prostitution is regarded as an aspect of violence against women and children…gender inequality will remain unattainable so long as men buy, sell and exploit women and children by prostituting them.” The Swedish law provides for prison sentences of up to six months for the buyers of sexual services, six years for pimps and 10 years for traffickers of prostitutes.

“Banning prostitution would simply drive it underground, putting prostitutes at greater risk of assault and exploitation”

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll