header-logo header-logo

ZT (Kosovo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 6, [2009] All ER (D) 38 (Feb)

12 February 2009 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Issue: 7356 / Categories:
printer mail-detail

Peter Hungerford-Welch, associate dean, The City Law School, City University London. W www.city.ac.uk/law

Rule 353 of the Immigration Rules applies where a human rights or asylum claim has been refused and any appeal relating to that claim is no longer pending. Th e procedure it lays down must be applied if a claim has been refused and no appeal has been instituted. The secretary of state should apply the r 353 procedure in respect of cases that have been certifi ed under s 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, and should, in all cases, treat a claim as having a realistic prospect of success unless it is clearly unfounded.

Issue: 7356 / Categories:
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll