Admas Habteslasie
Barrister
Admas Habteslasie is a barrister at Landmark Chambers. He spent the 2015/16 judicial year as a judicial assistant to Lord Neuberger, President of the Supreme Court (www.landmarkchambers.co.uk)
Barrister
Admas Habteslasie is a barrister at Landmark Chambers. He spent the 2015/16 judicial year as a judicial assistant to Lord Neuberger, President of the Supreme Court (www.landmarkchambers.co.uk)
"A welcome addition to any international law library and, for those undertaking research in relation to fair trial breaches in the criminal law context in particular, the book will be an invaluable resource and stands to establish itself as the first port of call"
The Supreme Court held that the bedroom tax is discriminatory, but only in part, notes Admas Habteslasie
Show
8
Results
8
MOVERS & SHAKERS
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams
Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=961ae4db_1)
HFW—Simon Petch
Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire
95ca96e3d47f4eff8d147c4f0df17c77.tmb-mov69x69.png?sfvrsn=3db5d86b_1)
Freeths—Richard Lockhart
Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office
NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
