Andrew Ritchie KC, 9 Gough Square, London (aritchie@9goughsquare.co.uk; www.9goughsquare.co.uk)
Andrew Ritchie KC, 9 Gough Square, London (aritchie@9goughsquare.co.uk; www.9goughsquare.co.uk)
Dealing with the MIB under the Untraced Drivers Agreement 2003 has become much clearer after a recent arbitration ruling. Andrew Ritchie QC reports
Part two: Who should pay for additional educational needs? Andrew Ritchie QC
Who should pay for additional educational needs, asks Andrew Ritchie QC
Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating
West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire
Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire
The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ