Consulting Editors
Golden Strait Corporation v Nippon Yusen Kubishika Kaisha, R (on the application of Hurst) v Northern district of London coroner
Eskelinen and others v Finland (app no 63235/00), Evans v United Kingdom (app no 6339/05)
McKinnon v Government of the USA and another, Hurstanger Ltd v Wilson and another
BR (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Departmant; MD (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Baxendale-Walker v Law Society
Show
8
Results
8
MOVERS & SHAKERS
FOIL—Bridget Tatham
Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=1d8709f4_1)
Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair
Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London
Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson
Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor
NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
