header-logo header-logo

Law digest

Subscribe

B v M (1) [2015] EWHC 2941 (Fam), [2015] All ER (D) 221 (Oct)

DMWSHNZ Ltd (In Members’ Voluntary Liquidation) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2015] EWCA Civ 1036, [2015] All ER (D) 191 (Oct)

Tarakhil v Home Office [2015] EWHC 2845 (QB), [2015] All ER (D) 194 (Oct)

T & A Textiles and Hosiery Ltd v Hala Textile UK Ltd and others [2015] EWHC 2888 (IPEC), [2015] All ER (D) 217 (Oct)

RE v United Kingdom (App. No. 62498/11) [2015] ECHR 62498/11, [2015] All ER (D) 227 (Oct)

Teva UK Ltd v Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co KG [2015] EWHC 2963 (Pat), [2015] All ER (D) 214 (Oct)

Umeyor v Nwakamma [2015] EWHC 2980 (QB), [2015] All ER (D) 195 (Oct)

Stolt Kestrel BV v Sener Petrol Denizcilik Ticaret AS; CDE S.A. v Sure Wind Marine Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 1035, [2015] All ER (D) 146 (Oct)

JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov [2015] UKSC 64, [2015] All ER (D) 175 (Oct)

United States of America v Nolan [2015] UKSC 63, [2015] All ER (D) 183 (Oct)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll