header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 2 December 2022

02 December 2022
Issue: 8005 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Contempt

Cuciurean v Secretary of State for Transport and another [2022] EWCA Civ 1519, [2022] All ER (D) 60 (Nov)

The King’s Bench Division dismissed the appellant’s appeal against his previous order as of right. This was in regard to the judge sentencing the appellant to 268 days’ immediate custody for contempt of court. He also fined him £3,000. The appellant was committed for contempt of court for 12 breaches of an injunction protecting HS2 land. The court held, among other things that it was not appropriate to fine the appellant on the particular facts of that case. He had no assets and was the subject of a term of immediate custody. The fine was therefore quashed. As to the methodology by which the judge calculated the overall term, they did not consider it appropriate. It was appropriate for that court to review the overall sanction. Overall, they found that the period of 268 days’ imprisonment was not excessive or unreasonable.


Criminal

R v Elmi [2022] EWCA Crim 1428, [2022]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll