header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
28 July 2023 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 8035 / Categories: Features , Media , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

‘That’s classified!’

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
132276
As events in the US bring classified documents out of the shadows, Athelstane Aamodt shines a light on government secrecy

We’ve all seen it. That bit in a film when a plucky reporter asks about the existence of a rumoured secret black-ops mission that appears to have killed a lot of innocent civilians during their mission and for which they have gone undetected and unpunished. ‘That’s classified’, replies the aloof official, peremptorily ending the conversation.

The classification of documents by governments has become topical in recent months: Presidents Donald Trump and Joe Biden, and Vice-President Mike Pence, have been found to have classified documents in their homes. Thus far only Donald Trump has been indicted, and he has entered ‘not guilty’ pleas to 37 federal charges of document mishandling.

There is always something a little disconcerting about certain pieces of information being ‘classified’. Democracies, that are after all (at least notionally) founded on principles of transparency and openness, appear to be acting against their own nature by preventing their citizens from seeing all

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Driving test fraudsters steer towards jail
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
NLJ this week: Deepfakes demand data law muscle
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
NLJ this week: 40% penalty for coercive control
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
NLJ this week: Mbappé row spotlights ‘ethics bonuses’
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
NLJ this week: Appeal court reins in ‘wrong defendant’ switcheroo

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll