header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
28 July 2023 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 8035 / Categories: Features , Media , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

‘That’s classified!’

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
132276
As events in the US bring classified documents out of the shadows, Athelstane Aamodt shines a light on government secrecy

We’ve all seen it. That bit in a film when a plucky reporter asks about the existence of a rumoured secret black-ops mission that appears to have killed a lot of innocent civilians during their mission and for which they have gone undetected and unpunished. ‘That’s classified’, replies the aloof official, peremptorily ending the conversation.

The classification of documents by governments has become topical in recent months: Presidents Donald Trump and Joe Biden, and Vice-President Mike Pence, have been found to have classified documents in their homes. Thus far only Donald Trump has been indicted, and he has entered ‘not guilty’ pleas to 37 federal charges of document mishandling.

There is always something a little disconcerting about certain pieces of information being ‘classified’. Democracies, that are after all (at least notionally) founded on principles of transparency and openness, appear to be acting against their own nature by preventing their citizens from seeing all

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Policing the safeguards when appointing trust corporations
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
NLJ this week: What the court considers when assessing refusal of ADR
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
NLJ this week: Finding innovative ways to fund the justice gap
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Two’s company, but three’s a crowd in financial provision cases
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Charities Appeals Supplement: March 2026
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll