header-logo header-logo

28 July 2023 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 8035 / Categories: Features , Media , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

‘That’s classified!’

132276
As events in the US bring classified documents out of the shadows, Athelstane Aamodt shines a light on government secrecy

We’ve all seen it. That bit in a film when a plucky reporter asks about the existence of a rumoured secret black-ops mission that appears to have killed a lot of innocent civilians during their mission and for which they have gone undetected and unpunished. ‘That’s classified’, replies the aloof official, peremptorily ending the conversation.

The classification of documents by governments has become topical in recent months: Presidents Donald Trump and Joe Biden, and Vice-President Mike Pence, have been found to have classified documents in their homes. Thus far only Donald Trump has been indicted, and he has entered ‘not guilty’ pleas to 37 federal charges of document mishandling.

There is always something a little disconcerting about certain pieces of information being ‘classified’. Democracies, that are after all (at least notionally) founded on principles of transparency and openness, appear to be acting against their own nature by preventing their citizens from seeing all

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll