header-logo header-logo

Licensing fast-track for conveyancing & probate professionals

15 December 2025
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Wills & Probate , Conveyancing , Career focus
printer mail-detail
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals

In December, the Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC) introduced the ‘Advanced Probate Exemption’, under which practitioners can skip parts of the CLC licence process if they already have certain Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (STEP) certificates. Practitioners with STEP certificates in will preparation and administration of estates or administration of trusts will only need to complete one further stage, the CLC’s professional obligations unit, to gain a CLC licence.

Claire Richardson, CLC director of authorisations, said the exemption ‘provides a clear route for experienced STEP professionals, giving them confidence in their professional and legal status.

‘By uniting the expertise of a leading probate body and specialist regulator, it delivers a single route to recognised practising rights. For employers, it offers a practical solution to the shortage of authorised practitioners, while for practitioners it supports straightforward career advancement in a critical area of demand’.

In November, the CLC launched the ‘professional experience’ route to allow fee earners with at least four years of experience in conveyancing or probate work to bypass the Level 4 Diploma and move straight to the Level 6 Diploma, which qualifies them as a licensed conveyancer or probate practitioner. To be eligible for this route, practitioners must be currently working in a law or accountancy firm in England or Wales, have four years’ continuous experience, be supervised by an authorised person, meet certain competency standards and provide a signed letter of support from their employer.

Richardson said: ‘Candidates will still undergo rigorous assessment, but more weight will be given to their practical experience. This will hopefully embolden more people, perhaps those who have taken time out and are daunted at the thought of returning to study, to realise their potential, underlining the CLC’s continued commitment to making qualifications as inclusive and accessible as possible while maintaining our usual high standards.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlie Hancock

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlie Hancock

Private wealth and tax offering bolstered by partner hire

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
back-to-top-scroll