header-logo header-logo

06 March 2026
Issue: 8152 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Abuse
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: 40% penalty for coercive control

243962
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473

Mr Justice Cusworth held that even where loss is not ‘easily measurable’, it may still be unfair to ignore the financial impact of abuse. 

The decision challenges the traditionally strict requirement for clearly quantifiable loss and blurs the line between emotional harm and economic consequence. Whether this marks a ‘new era’ or a fork in the road for conduct arguments remains to be seen.

Issue: 8152 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Abuse
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll