header-logo header-logo

06 March 2026 / Chris Bryden , Nicole Wallace
Issue: 8152 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce , Abuse
printer mail-detail

The cost of conduct

243962
40% off for coercive control: is abusive behaviour finally starting to carry financial weight in divorce proceedings? Chris Bryden & Nicole Wallace consider the arguments
  • In LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473, the High Court reduced the wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour, holding that conduct can justify departure from equality even where financial loss is not precisely quantifiable.
  • The judgment signals a potential shift towards a broader, more holistic approach to s 25(2)(g), MCA 1973, challenging the traditionally strict requirement for clearly measurable financial impact and reopening debate on the role of domestic abuse in financial remedies.

Conduct is back in the spotlight where financial remedies are concerned. In a rare example of a successful conduct argument, the High Court has taken the opportunity to address the issue of proof of negative financial impact arising out of personal misconduct, in LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473.

Background

The parties married in August 2011, having known one another for a short period

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll