header-logo header-logo

17 July 2026 / Roger Smith
Issue: 8170 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

‘This is Manchester. We do things differently here’

254944
© R Heilig/Shutterstock

Roger Smith considers the possible impact of ‘Manchesterism’ on government policies on access to justice

We are undoubtedly fated to hear much more about ‘Manchesterism’ in the next few months. It is the new buzzword associated with Labour’s likely new leader. There will be innumerable articles speculating on what it might mean for various areas of government policy. Let me get in early on access to justice.

An honourable history

Before we get to its ‘ism’, however, take a minute to contemplate the role of Manchester itself in access to justice. It has, after all, an honourable history. In the late 1970s, the Law Society established a Greater Manchester Legal Services Committee to bring together all the private and public access to justice provision. A subtext was undoubtedly the attempt to halt the advance of law centres. The good news was that the committee played a major role in showing what something we might now call a public-private partnership could do in identifying need and seeking innovative

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll