header-logo header-logo

17 July 2026 / Roger Smith
Issue: 8170 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

‘This is Manchester. We do things differently here’

254944
© R Heilig/Shutterstock

Roger Smith considers the possible impact of ‘Manchesterism’ on government policies on access to justice

We are undoubtedly fated to hear much more about ‘Manchesterism’ in the next few months. It is the new buzzword associated with Labour’s likely new leader. There will be innumerable articles speculating on what it might mean for various areas of government policy. Let me get in early on access to justice.

An honourable history

Before we get to its ‘ism’, however, take a minute to contemplate the role of Manchester itself in access to justice. It has, after all, an honourable history. In the late 1970s, the Law Society established a Greater Manchester Legal Services Committee to bring together all the private and public access to justice provision. A subtext was undoubtedly the attempt to halt the advance of law centres. The good news was that the committee played a major role in showing what something we might now call a public-private partnership could do in identifying need and seeking innovative

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll