header-logo header-logo

1 Hare Court—Peter Mitchell KC & Amber Sheridan

29 September 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
Leading family law set strengthens ranks with high-profile additions

1 Hare Court has welcomed two leading family barristers, Peter Mitchell KC and Amber Sheridan, boosting its membership to 52. The set, renowned for its depth of expertise in matrimonial finance, children cases, cohabitation disputes and wider family matters, has further cemented its reputation as the preeminent chambers in family law with the appointments.

Mitchell (pictured), called to the Bar in 1996 and appointed silk in 2020, is recognised as one of the foremost family barristers in the country. He has appeared in a number of landmark Supreme Court and Court of Appeal cases, including Agbaje, Sharland, Prest, Brack and Hart. His practice focuses on high-value financial cases involving complex asset structures, jurisdictional issues and disclosure disputes, alongside his work as a respected private FDR evaluator.

Sheridan, called in 2008, has built a strong practice across all areas of family law, with particular expertise in financial claims and Schedule 1 provision. She is well regarded for her work in cases with international elements, especially Part III MPFA 1984 proceedings, and also advises on professional negligence claims. Like Mitchell, she sits as a private FDR evaluator with a strong record of promoting settlement.

Steve McCrone, senior clerk at 1 Hare Court, said: ‘We’re thrilled to welcome Peter and Amber to chambers. Both of them have a superlative standing in the profession and a proven track record of success in the family law field. Their arrival augments our internationally renowned reputation, allowing us to provide clients with an even greater breadth of support.’ The appointments underline 1 Hare Court’s continuing growth and reinforce its standing at the forefront of family law in the UK and internationally.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll