header-logo header-logo

08 May 2026
Issue: 8160 / Categories: Legal News , Landlord&tenant , Housing , Property
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Renters’ Rights revolution begins—brace for tribunal chaos

249003
© Getty images

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

In NLJ this week, Bacon writes that the new Renters’ Rights regime dramatically reshapes the balance between landlords and tenants. Although section 21’s demise has been hailed as a tenant victory, he argues its repeal may actually simplify possession claims for landlords by removing technical traps surrounding deposits and gas safety rules.

At the same time, tenants gain stronger protections against rent increases and more opportunities to challenge landlords through tribunals. Bacon predicts those tribunals will become heavily congested because tenants now have little downside in disputing rent rises, potentially delaying increases for months. He also highlights the end of the notorious ‘AST trap’ affecting leaseholders and shared owners.

Overall, he sees ‘swings and roundabouts’: landlords gain broader possession grounds but face more uncertainty, bigger rent repayment risks and longer procedural delays.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll