header-logo header-logo

30 March 2022
Issue: 7973 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

15% legal aid offer is actually 9%

The government’s placatory offer of an extra 15% funding―meeting the minimum recommendation of the Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid, led by Sir Christopher Bellamy―appears to have fallen apart under examination

The Law Society said the Justice Secretary’s claim last week to have matched Sir Christopher’s recommendation of at least 15% extra funds for criminal legal aid practitioners was nothing but ‘spin’.

Justice secretary Dominic Raab told the House of Commons on 22 March that ‘we matched the Bellamy recommendations on the quantum of investment and on the… uplift for fees’.

In fact, the Law Society claims, the proposals fall substantially short of what they first appeared to be. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) impact assessment (table 3, p12) shows the total increase for solicitors is 9% (not 15% as promised), a figure confirmed during subsequent meetings between Law Society and ministry officials.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘Now we know that, for solicitors, the reality is different. We can no longer support the government’s proposals. The government has botched its response.’

Boyce said, unless the government changes tack, the Law Society no longer believes there is a viable economic future in criminal legal aid.

She appealed to criminal justice practitioners to make their views heard by responding to the MoJ consultation before 7 June. Click here for more information.

Boyce urged the MoJ to amend its proposals immediately to bring the funding for solicitors up to the full 15% to make the system economically viable. She suggested this could be done by: increasing payments for police station and magistrates’ court work still further; increasing the basic fee for Crown Court work; and guaranteeing additional funding on restructuring the Litigators’ Graduated Fee Scheme (LGFS).

An MoJ spokesperson said: ‘We have accepted Sir Christopher’s recommendation for an uplift in fees and our proposals will deliver an extra £135m a year in criminal legal aid―the biggest increase in a decade.

‘This is alongside our ambitious proposals to ensure professionals are better paid for the work they carry out, boosting pay for lawyers representing suspects in police stations, magistrates’ court and youth court by 15% and funding the training and accreditation of solicitors and solicitor advocates.’ 

Issue: 7973 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll