header-logo header-logo

3rd party damage recovery

08 October 2009 / Paul Bugden
Issue: 7388 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Paul Bugden examines the various ways in which a claimant can recover in damages sums payable to third parties

One of the more difficult areas of damages arises where a claimant seeks to recover an indemnity in respect of sums paid or payable to third parties in respect of claims made against him which are said to arise out the defendant’s breach of contract with the claimant. Such claims can also of course arise in tort; in which case much the same considerations will apply.

In general, a claimant should be able to rely upon a judgment (English or foreign) or award without more, so as to establish the amount of his liability, leaving it to the defendant to show, if he can, that the claimant has failed to mitigate his loss or that the award is (in the relevant sense) unreasonable or perverse.

That is so even if it can later be shown that the competent tribunal made an error of fact or law and, unless the tribunal acted perversely or reached

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll