header-logo header-logo

3rd party damage recovery

08 October 2009 / Paul Bugden
Issue: 7388 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Paul Bugden examines the various ways in which a claimant can recover in damages sums payable to third parties

One of the more difficult areas of damages arises where a claimant seeks to recover an indemnity in respect of sums paid or payable to third parties in respect of claims made against him which are said to arise out the defendant’s breach of contract with the claimant. Such claims can also of course arise in tort; in which case much the same considerations will apply.

In general, a claimant should be able to rely upon a judgment (English or foreign) or award without more, so as to establish the amount of his liability, leaving it to the defendant to show, if he can, that the claimant has failed to mitigate his loss or that the award is (in the relevant sense) unreasonable or perverse.

That is so even if it can later be shown that the competent tribunal made an error of fact or law and, unless the tribunal acted perversely or reached

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll