header-logo header-logo

7 May 2009

08 November 2007 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7296 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Neil Parpworth presents the case for fixed-term Parliaments

The Parliament Act 1911 provides that the life of a Westminster Parliament is limited to five years. In effect, therefore, in the absence of exceptional circumstances justifying an extension, there must be a general election within five years of the previous election. Thus, unlike the devolved legislatures in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, the Westminster Parliament does not sit for fixed terms. A general election may be called as and when the prime minister of the day desires, provided that the monarch agrees that Parliament be dissolved using her power under the royal prerogative. The political advantage which accrues to the party in government is therefore obvious and considerable.

POWER TO DISSOLVE PARLIAMENT

Had Gordon Brown asked the Queen to grant a dissolution last month, it is certain that she would have done as she was bid. To justify an election, Brown might have argued that, as a relatively new prime minister, it was important that his government obtained its own mandate from the electorate rather

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll