header-logo header-logo

21 May 2010 / Jonathan Herring
Issue: 7418 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

7 ways of getting it wrong

Jonathan Herring laments a raft of predictable child protection failures

To understand Re S (Children) [2010] EWCA Civ 421, [2010] All ER (D) 169 (Apr) it is necessary to set out the background in some detail. The father, who was British and aged 58, started a relationship with a Romanian woman, when she was 15. He married her a few days after her 16th birthday. He then met another Romanian woman aged 17. He lived with both women and had children with them. Family life was described by Wilson LJ as “chaotic, abusive and dysfunctional”. He summarised the court’s findings concerning the father in dramatic terms: “[A] shocking, violent, selfish bully and a sexual predator, who had devoted a lifetime to wrongdoing.”

This case concerned the second of the two women, who at the time of the hearing had moved to England with the father. She had two children: a girl aged five and a boy aged nine months. Although the mother and father had now separated there was a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll