header-logo header-logo

20 October 2023 / William Gibson
Issue: 8045 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

A lady not for burning

143245
William Gibson on how an unsuccessful, widely-reported prosecution proved to be an unbeatable marketing tool

Any books which fell foul of the Obscene Publications Act 1857 could be shipped to a bonfire. When that Act was superseded in 1959 publishers knew that the new provisions and definitions would have to be tested in court before they could embark on a major print run.

Penguin Books decided in 1960 to publish a collection of works by D H Lawrence to mark the 30th anniversary of his death. One of the books was Lady Chatterley’s Lover (LCL). Written in 1928 it had been widely banned world wide because of the high sexual content and prolific use of four-letter words. They decided to invite prosecution to test the strength of the new Act so they delivered 12 copies to a police inspector. This constituted ‘limited distribution’ so proceedings were begun.

The book

The story is basically of a love affair between the sexually-deprived aristocratic Lady Constance Chatterley (whose husband was disabled in the First

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll