header-logo header-logo

27 March 2026 / Fred Philpott
Issue: 8155 / Categories: Opinion , Limitation
printer mail-detail

A limitation revolution?

245642
Fred Philpott on how the Supreme Court has transformed the existing law as to limitations

Before 1623, there were no statutory limitation periods. A land ‘owner’ could not be certain that their occupancy of the land could not be challenged by someone alleging that they had better title because of events going back very many decades, if not more. This instability and economic uncertainty in land ownership which was at the centre of the country’s economic system had to be dealt with, and resulted in the first Limitation Act in 1623. The detailed history of this legislation, and an extensive review of other common law jurisdictions, is set out at [41] to [109] in the recent Supreme Court judgment of THG plc v Zedra Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd [2026] UKSC 6. This decision is a good example of what the Supreme Court can produce that has much wider ramifications than the instant case.

Limitations are not an esoteric area of law. The subject is essential to the proper administration of civil justice (and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll