header-logo header-logo

27 March 2026 / Fred Philpott
Issue: 8155 / Categories: Opinion , Limitation
printer mail-detail

A limitation revolution?

245642
Fred Philpott on how the Supreme Court has transformed the existing law as to limitations

Before 1623, there were no statutory limitation periods. A land ‘owner’ could not be certain that their occupancy of the land could not be challenged by someone alleging that they had better title because of events going back very many decades, if not more. This instability and economic uncertainty in land ownership which was at the centre of the country’s economic system had to be dealt with, and resulted in the first Limitation Act in 1623. The detailed history of this legislation, and an extensive review of other common law jurisdictions, is set out at [41] to [109] in the recent Supreme Court judgment of THG plc v Zedra Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd [2026] UKSC 6. This decision is a good example of what the Supreme Court can produce that has much wider ramifications than the instant case.

Limitations are not an esoteric area of law. The subject is essential to the proper administration of civil justice (and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll