header-logo header-logo

15 April 2026
Issue: 8157 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Court of Protection
printer mail-detail

Family Division president Sir Andrew McFarlane retires

Sir Andrew McFarlane has retired from the judiciary, following nearly eight years as president of the Family Division and president of the Court of Protection

He championed transparency and media access in the family court, culminating in a reporting pilot in 2023 and national rollout last year. This allowed media reporting with appropriate safeguards on issues previously shrouded in secrecy.

He kept the family courts working through the COVID-19 pandemic, successfully adapting to digital hearings in a highly sensitive area of law. Last month saw the launch of another groundbreaking initiative, the Child Focused Court, which aims to reduce the number of hearings and improve outcomes for survivors of domestic abuse.

Sir Andrew grew up in Solihull and on Merseyside, attended Durham University, was called to the Bar in 1977, took silk in 1998 and was appointed a High Court Judge (Family Division) in 2005 and Lord Justice of Appeal in 2011.

Issue: 8157 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Court of Protection
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll