header-logo header-logo

29 July 2020 / Nick Hopkins , Christine Land
Issue: 7897 / Categories: Opinion , Property
printer mail-detail

Leasehold reform: a long time coming

25146
Nick Hopkins & Christine Land outline the Law Commission proposals designed to pave the way to genuine homeownership

Change in the leasehold sector has been a long time coming. On 21 July, the Law Commission published three reports which seek to give leaseholders an interest which they can finally, and confidently, call ‘ownership’.

The case for reform

Dissatisfaction with residential leasehold as a model for homeownership is not new. As far back as 1884, there have been attempts to introduce reforms that will improve the lot of residential leaseholders, and to redress the power imbalance with landlords. 136 years and over 50 bills later, dissatisfaction remains rife. That is because leasehold, on a fundamental level, is an inherently inappropriate means of providing homeownership. It is a system which enables the landlord to benefit from the features of leasehold that cause homeowners the most hardship. As a time-limited interest, the homeowner’s asset ‘wastes away’ and reduces in value over time and, in so doing, increases the value of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll