header-logo header-logo

A matter of life & (assisted) death

09 May 2025 / David Locke
Issue: 8115 / Categories: Opinion , Health & safety , Human rights
printer mail-detail
217912
Unworkable & unethical? David Locke unpicks the flawed drafting of the End of Life Bill

The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill is a monumentally poor piece of drafting, unbecoming of the issue which it seeks to address. If we assume the point of principle is decided in favour of permitting ‘assisted dying’, the Bill proposes a framework which, insofar as it is comprehensible, is both unworkable and unethical. The following issues need to be addressed by Parliament.

Self-administration

If enacted in its current form, the Bill will make it permissible for a doctor to assist a person to ingest or otherwise self-administer the substance which will bring about the end of life; but it will not be legal to actually administer it. There is a modest attempt made to expand on this: it will be lawful for a doctor to ready the substance for administration; to ‘prepare a medical device’ to enable self-administration; and to ‘assist [the patient] to ingest or otherwise self-administer the substance’.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll