header-logo header-logo

A matter of life & (assisted) death

09 May 2025 / David Locke
Issue: 8115 / Categories: Opinion , Health & safety , Human rights
printer mail-detail
217912
Unworkable & unethical? David Locke unpicks the flawed drafting of the End of Life Bill

The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill is a monumentally poor piece of drafting, unbecoming of the issue which it seeks to address. If we assume the point of principle is decided in favour of permitting ‘assisted dying’, the Bill proposes a framework which, insofar as it is comprehensible, is both unworkable and unethical. The following issues need to be addressed by Parliament.

Self-administration

If enacted in its current form, the Bill will make it permissible for a doctor to assist a person to ingest or otherwise self-administer the substance which will bring about the end of life; but it will not be legal to actually administer it. There is a modest attempt made to expand on this: it will be lawful for a doctor to ready the substance for administration; to ‘prepare a medical device’ to enable self-administration; and to ‘assist [the patient] to ingest or otherwise self-administer the substance’.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Mike Wilson, Blake Morgan

NLJ Career Profile: Mike Wilson, Blake Morgan

Mike Wilson, managing partner of Blake Morgan chair of the CBI’s South-East Council, reflects on his career the challenges that have defined him

Clarke Willmott—Alexandria Kittlety

Clarke Willmott—Alexandria Kittlety

Partner joins commercial property team in Birmingham

Birketts—Will MacFarlane & Sarah Dodds

Birketts—Will MacFarlane & Sarah Dodds

Family team expands with double appointment in Bristol office

NEWS
Lawyers have expressed dismay at the Chancellor Rachel Reeve’s decision to impose a £2,000 cap on salary sacrifice contributions
NLJ is inviting its readers to take part in this year’s annual reader research, a short survey designed to help shape the future direction of the magazine. The questionnaire consists of just eight quick questions and offers an opportunity for legal professionals to share their views on the content, coverage and issues that matter most to them.
The Law Society has urged regulators not to ban the term ‘no win no fee’, as the profession contemplates measures to prevent a disaster like the SSB Group collapse from happening again
The legal profession's leaders have mounted a robust defence of trial by jury, following reports that Justice Secretary David Lammy is considering restricting it to rape, murder, manslaughter and other cases that are in the public interest
CILEX (the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives) has been granted permission to appeal Mazur, a decision which has caused consternation among litigation firms
back-to-top-scroll