header-logo header-logo

09 January 2026
Issue: 8145 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Public Accounts Committee warn of ‘extinction’ risk for legal aid

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned

In a devastating report issued this week, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) said large gaps in provision exist in parts of the country, particularly for housing and debt advice, despite the committee highlighting the issue in 2024. Last year, the government committed an extra £20m to early advice housing and immigration legal aid—the first increase since 1996.

Referring to LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012), the committee said the MoJ has not fully grasped the impact of removing access to most early legal advice more than a decade ago, which research suggests is leading to additional costs in the system.

The committee highlighted the danger of over-reliance on remote advice while almost one quarter (about 24%) of people have difficulty accessing digital and online technology. It also sought clarity on whether enough is being done to address risks in legal aid systems, following the cyber-attack at the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) in December 2024, which was not discovered until April last year and which exposed personal data of legal aid clients.

Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chair, PAC, said: ‘The reforms of a decade ago are now at serious risk of going down in history as an extinction event for the entitlement to access to legal advice in large parts of the country.

‘Our report finds government remaining stubbornly uninterested in whether this is the case, but it must now wake up on this subject.’

Liz Bayram, chief executive of AdviceUK, said: ‘Our members who provide legal aid services have repeatedly raised these concerns, and it is positive to see the committee making clear not only what needs to change but the urgency with which these changes must happen.

‘We also call for independent advice to be recognised and funded as part of the UK’s essential justice infrastructure. Embedded in their communities, advice services are often the first and most trusted source of help for individuals, including marginalised groups who would otherwise remain excluded from the justice system.’

Law Society president Mark Evans said: ‘Despite some recent improvement, the government has not done enough to put legal aid on a sustainable footing.

‘We welcome the recommendations set out by the Public Accounts Committee and share the view that the MoJ should routinely review profitability and sustainability for all types of legal aid. We also agree that the MoJ should make public the lessons learned from the LAA cyber-attack and whether funding and provisions are in place to stop it happening again.

‘We had long warned about the LAA’s antiquated computer systems. Their fragility has prevented vital reforms, including updates to the means test that could help millions more access legal aid. The cyber-attack has delayed their implementation even further. The MoJ must publish a timetable for implementing all the means test changes.’

Issue: 8145 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

From mowing lawns to life at the Bar: Stephen Ward reflects on an unconventional career

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Commercial property partner joins Clarke Willmott in Southampton

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Robert Tiffen joins Ellisons as Partner in growing Norwich office

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll