header-logo header-logo

A metwand for modern monarchy

24 February 2023 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 8014 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law , Media
printer mail-detail
112054
Equality before the law for all? Michael L Nash navigates the complexity of cases involving royal litigants

In 1923, a century ago, a case came before the Old Bailey in London regarding the murder of an Egyptian aristocrat in the Savoy Hotel. It sounds like something out of Agatha Christie, but in fact it caused anxious ripples in royal circles and beyond, for the person accused of the murder, one Marguerite Al-Fahmy (née Alibert), had been the mistress of the then Prince of Wales, later King Edward VIII and subsequently Duke of Windsor.

He had then been a soldier in Paris in 1917 and 1918. There were compromising letters. It became necessary, in the eyes of the court and the government, for his early liaison with Marguerite to be hushed up. This was conveyed to the judges who were hearing the case. Special treatment being accorded to royal persons came sharply into focus.

But this was not new. In 1911, in the case of R v Mylius, the king,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll