header-logo header-logo

24 February 2023 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 8014 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law , Media
printer mail-detail

A metwand for modern monarchy

112054
Equality before the law for all? Michael L Nash navigates the complexity of cases involving royal litigants

In 1923, a century ago, a case came before the Old Bailey in London regarding the murder of an Egyptian aristocrat in the Savoy Hotel. It sounds like something out of Agatha Christie, but in fact it caused anxious ripples in royal circles and beyond, for the person accused of the murder, one Marguerite Al-Fahmy (née Alibert), had been the mistress of the then Prince of Wales, later King Edward VIII and subsequently Duke of Windsor.

He had then been a soldier in Paris in 1917 and 1918. There were compromising letters. It became necessary, in the eyes of the court and the government, for his early liaison with Marguerite to be hushed up. This was conveyed to the judges who were hearing the case. Special treatment being accorded to royal persons came sharply into focus.

But this was not new. In 1911, in the case of R v Mylius, the king,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll