header-logo header-logo

10 October 2019 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7859 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law , Brexit
printer mail-detail

A realignment of law & power?

Michael L Nash examines the delicate balancing act between the three pillars of power in times of crisis
  • Throughout British history, the balance between the executive, the legislature and the judiciary has always been shifting and realigning. 
  • What role does the monarch play in this balance?

With considerable foresight, Professor Geoffrey Keeton wrote in 1952, in his book The Passing of Parliament: ‘It is in times of difficulty that the dangers from extremists are greatest… it is then that desperate remedies have the best chance of being tried, and when there may be a general disposition to trust a group, or even a single man, with uncontrolled powers, to make far-reaching experiments. Under the present conditions which now exist in Great Britain, this can be quickly and legally achieved by… continuing to exclude or to confine within narrow limits the right of recourse to the ordinary courts.’

This, then, brings into sharp focus the role of the trinity of powers which exist in any country

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll