header-logo header-logo

06 November 2026 / Fred Philpott
Issue: 8184 / Categories: Opinion , Financial services litigation , Consumer
printer mail-detail

A sting in the claim

263053
© Getty images

Fred Philpott considers the twists, turns & quantum leaps of otherwise ordinary-seeming cases

The law has been much concerned with payments made in breach of various types of duty. It is very understandable. Human nature often results in businesses of various types, involving agency, planning, the granting of contracts and many others, having this temptation.

A ‘backhander’ may seem fairly harmless to those involved, but it is insidious and corrosive to our nation. Western Europe, the ‘old’ Commonwealth and North America go to great lengths to prevent this type of corruption. Even so, it will surface—eg in football (Logicrose v Southend United Football Club [1988] 1 WLR 1256) and the infamous case of architect John Poulson in the early 1970s. Other countries may take a lighter view on the issue.

Thus, in the UK we have a substantial body of law in which our judges have, over the centuries, been determined to deal firmly with activities which could be described in a general way as bribery. Lord Justice Tuckey

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll