header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
05 December 2014 / John Sharples
Issue: 7633 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

About time

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
john-sharples

Can you make time of the essence if a contract is silent on the point, asks John Sharples

You have a contract which requires you to do something by a certain date or within a reasonable period of time. You don’t. Fortunately the contract does not make time of the essence. So the other party serves a notice purporting to make it so. You fail to comply with that too. Now the other side has you on toast and can terminate the contract forthwith. Simples!

Well, not quite. As Sir Terence Etherton said at first instance in Urban 1 (Blonk Street) v Ayres [2012] EWHC 2765 (Ch): “Even today aspects of the law relating to time provisions in contracts for the sale of land and the relevance of notices to complete can be puzzling and there is still room for clarification of the law.” In particular, recent cases have struggled with two questions: what does serving such a notice really do, if the contract is silent on the point? And what is the effect of failing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll