header-logo header-logo

About time

05 December 2014 / John Sharples
Issue: 7633 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
john-sharples

Can you make time of the essence if a contract is silent on the point, asks John Sharples

You have a contract which requires you to do something by a certain date or within a reasonable period of time. You don’t. Fortunately the contract does not make time of the essence. So the other party serves a notice purporting to make it so. You fail to comply with that too. Now the other side has you on toast and can terminate the contract forthwith. Simples!

Well, not quite. As Sir Terence Etherton said at first instance in Urban 1 (Blonk Street) v Ayres [2012] EWHC 2765 (Ch): “Even today aspects of the law relating to time provisions in contracts for the sale of land and the relevance of notices to complete can be puzzling and there is still room for clarification of the law.” In particular, recent cases have struggled with two questions: what does serving such a notice really do, if the contract is silent on the point? And what is the effect of failing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll