header-logo header-logo

03 November 2011
Issue: 7488 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Act quickly to claim fees, or lose out

Professionals seeking payment of their fees need to do so promptly or risk becoming time-barred

Professionals seeking payment of their fees need to do so promptly or risk becoming time-barred, a recent Court of Appeal decision has shown.

In Smales v Lea & Ors, an ex tempore decision delivered on 19 October, the court upheld a finding that the appellant surveyor’s claim for payment was out of time.

The surveyor completed work on the window of a property with subsidence in 1998 but did not bill the homeowner’s insurer (his fees formed part of the owner’s insurance claim) until 2001. The insurers queried the bill. Due to ill health and other reasons, the surveyor did not respond until 2007. The insurers were only willing to pay a lower sum than that invoiced for. In 2008, the surveyor commenced proceedings for payment of his fees from the executors of the owner’s estate (the owner had since died).

The court found that the surveyor’s cause of action accrued from 1999 at the latest because he was able to claim payment once he completed the majority of the work and did not need to wait until he performed all his obligations (which included completing the insurance claim). Therefore, his claim was time-barred.

Issue: 7488 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll