header-logo header-logo

08 October 2025
Issue: 8134 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Immigration & asylum , Human rights
printer mail-detail

‘Activist judges’ or an all-powerful justice secretary?

A future Conservative government would abolish the Sentencing Council and Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and sack judges who defended migrants’ rights, shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick has said

Addressing Conservative Party conference in Manchester this week, Jenrick criticised ‘activist’ judges and complained that ‘dozens of judges’ have ‘broadcast their open borders views’, supported migrant charities or ‘spent their whole careers fighting to keep illegal migrants in this country… The public rightly ask—how independent are they?’

Jenrick said the Conservatives would abolish the JAC and hand over the right to appoint judges to the justice secretary—restoring the old system that existed prior to Prime Minister Tony Blair’s reforms in 2006. The justice secretary would also set sentencing policy under a future Conservative government, while the Sentencing Council would be abolished.

Jenrick said the public were sick of ‘voting for tougher sentences and getting the opposite.

‘No longer will an unaccountable quango be able to subvert the will of the British people for criminals to be properly punished’.

In May, the government committed to introducing a presumption against short sentences and expanding the use of community sentencing, as recommended by Jenrick’s Conservative predecessor David Gauke, who served as justice secretary under Prime Minister Theresa May.

Party leader Kemi Badenoch used her conference speech to announce the next Conservative manifesto will contain a commitment to leave the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and repeal the Human Rights Act.

However, Law Society president Richard Atkinson accused the Conservative Party of ‘putting political interest above the public good.

‘It protects us from the power of the state. Without the backstop of the ECHR, governments of whatever party will be able to erode our rights with no come-back. We can tighten border controls without stripping the British public of their rights under the ECHR.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

Nick Vernon of Walkers on swapping Birmingham for Bermuda and building an employment practice by the sea

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Global firm re-elects CEO for second term

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Business appoints managing director of operational excellence

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll