header-logo header-logo

08 October 2025
Issue: 8134 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Immigration & asylum , Human rights
printer mail-detail

‘Activist judges’ or an all-powerful justice secretary?

A future Conservative government would abolish the Sentencing Council and Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and sack judges who defended migrants’ rights, shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick has said

Addressing Conservative Party conference in Manchester this week, Jenrick criticised ‘activist’ judges and complained that ‘dozens of judges’ have ‘broadcast their open borders views’, supported migrant charities or ‘spent their whole careers fighting to keep illegal migrants in this country… The public rightly ask—how independent are they?’

Jenrick said the Conservatives would abolish the JAC and hand over the right to appoint judges to the justice secretary—restoring the old system that existed prior to Prime Minister Tony Blair’s reforms in 2006. The justice secretary would also set sentencing policy under a future Conservative government, while the Sentencing Council would be abolished.

Jenrick said the public were sick of ‘voting for tougher sentences and getting the opposite.

‘No longer will an unaccountable quango be able to subvert the will of the British people for criminals to be properly punished’.

In May, the government committed to introducing a presumption against short sentences and expanding the use of community sentencing, as recommended by Jenrick’s Conservative predecessor David Gauke, who served as justice secretary under Prime Minister Theresa May.

Party leader Kemi Badenoch used her conference speech to announce the next Conservative manifesto will contain a commitment to leave the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and repeal the Human Rights Act.

However, Law Society president Richard Atkinson accused the Conservative Party of ‘putting political interest above the public good.

‘It protects us from the power of the state. Without the backstop of the ECHR, governments of whatever party will be able to erode our rights with no come-back. We can tighten border controls without stripping the British public of their rights under the ECHR.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll